L-1A Dismissed — Photographic Products (2005): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial, as required by regulation. The AAO also concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner had not established the beneficiary would be employed in a true managerial or executive capacity, but was instead performing routine operational duties.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF