L-1A Dismissed — Plastics Distribution (2005): the motion to reconsider was dismissed because the

Decision Summary

The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the previous decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The petitioner's counsel merely disagreed with the weight the AAO assigned to evidence, arguing that gross income should have been more determinative, but failed to provide precedent to support this claim. The AAO maintained that the beneficiary's actual duties, not gross income, are what define their employment capacity.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF