L-1A Dismissed — Shoe Wholesale (2006): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The initial denial was based on this deficiency, and the AAO upheld the decision, indicating that the evidence provided was insufficient to prove the beneficiary's role met the statutory definitions.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF