dismissed E-2 Case: Business

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 22376856 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: AUG. 04, 2022 
Form 1-129, Application for Extension of Stay (E-2 Treaty Investor) 
The Applicant seeks to employ the noncitizen in the United States as its chief executive officer under 
the E-2 nonirnrnigrant classification for treaty investors . See section 10l(a)(15)(E)(ii) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U .S.C. § l 101(a)(l5)(E)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e). In 
accordance with the regulations, the application for an extension of stay was filed on Form 1-129, 
Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 214.l(c)(l) , 214.2(e)(20) and (21). 
The Director denied the application. The Applicant appealed the decision to the Administrative 
Appeals Office (AAO). We will reject the appeal based on our lack of jurisdiction . 
Although an application for E-2 Treaty Investor status is made on Form 1-129 and E Supplement, there 
is no petition requirement and no petition determination that may be appealed . When it published the 
Final Rule governing the nonirnrnigrant classification, the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
(now U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)) noted: 
[U]nder section 103 of the Act, the service has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate 
applications for admission to this country, as well as applications for change of 
nonimrnigrant status to, or extensions of stay in, E nonirnrnigrant classification . In this 
regard, it should be noted that, unlike other employment-driven classifications, E 
nonimmigrant visa classification is not conferred by means of a petition , but instead by 
an application. 
62 Fed. Reg. 48138 (Sept. 12, 1997) (emphasis added). 
While the AAO has appellate jurisdiction over most employment-based nonimrnigrant visa petitions 
filed on Form 1-129, the application for E nonimrnigrant classification is an exception. Our appellate 
jurisdiction over the E nonirnrnigrant classification is limited to applications filed under 8 C.F.R. 
§ 214.2(e)(23), which provides for special procedures for classifying foreign investors in the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) as E-2 nonimmigrant treaty investors. The 
regulation specifically authorizes these employers to appeal denied E-2 CNMI applications to the 
AAO. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(23)(ix). 
With respect to all other decisions in Form 1-129 or 1-539 extension proceedings, the regulation at 
8 C.F.R. § 214.l(c)(5) states: 'There is no appeal from the denial of an application for extension of 
stay filed on Form 1-129 or 1-539." See also 8 C.F.R. § 248.3(g) (providing no appeal for denied 
change of status applications). 
Accordingly, the appeal will be rejected. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 
2