dismissed E-2

dismissed E-2 Case: Car Rental Service

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Car Rental Service

Decision Summary

The appeal was rejected, not on its merits, but on procedural grounds. According to the regulations at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.1(c)(5), there is no right to appeal the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. Therefore, the AAO concluded it had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Right To Appeal An Extension Of Stay

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re : 9868457 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for E-2 Treaty Investor 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : SEPT . 24, 2020 
The Applicant , an "on-demand" car rental service, seeks to employ the Beneficiary in the United States 
as its "Director" in the nonimmigrant classification of an E-2 Treaty Investor, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 
ยงยง 214 .2(e)(20) and (21) . In accordance with the regulations, the application for a change of status 
and extension of stay was filed on Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker. See 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 214. l(c)(l) . 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the application. The matter is now before us on 
appeal. The appeal will be rejected . 
Pursuant to the regulations at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.l(c)(S) there is no appeal from the denial of an application 
for an extension of status of an E-1 or E-2 treaty trader or treaty investor. We note that there is no petition 
requirement for E-2 Treaty Investors and there is no petition determination that may be appealed . When 
it published the Final Rule governing the nonimrnigrant classification, the Immigration and Naturalization 
Service (former INS, now USCIS) noted: 
[U]nder section 103 of the Act, the service has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate 
applications for admission to this country, as well as applications for change of 
nonimrnigrant status to, or extensions of stay in, E nonirnmigrant classification . In this 
regard, it should be noted that, unlike other employment-driven classifications, E 
nonimrnigrant visa classification is not conferred by means of a petition , but instead by an 
application. 
62 Fed. Reg. 48138 (Sept. 12, 1997). 
Although an appeal was subsequently filed, it must be rejected pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 214.l(c)(S), which states: 
Decision in Form 1-129 or 1-539 extension proceedings. Where an applicant or 
petitioner demonstrates eligibility for a requested extension, it may be granted at the 
discretion of the Service . There is no appeal from the denial of an application for 
extension of stay filed on Form 1- 129 or 1- 539. 
(Emphasis added.) 
Because this application is for a change of status and an extension of stay, the appeal will be rejected. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.