Dismissed E-2

E-2 Dismissed — Consulting (2021): the governing regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R

📅 2021-05-27 👤 Company 📂 Consulting

Decision Summary

The appeal was rejected because the governing regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(c)(5), state that there is no appeal from the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. The AAO determined it did not have jurisdiction to review the matter.

Criteria Discussed

Appealability Of Extension Of Stay Denial
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Related Decisions

Explore similar AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, field, and criteria discussed.

dismissed E-2 Case: Construction Management And Interior DesignSame visa type · Companydismissed E-2 Case: Engineering ConstructionSame visa type · Companydismissed E-2 Case: Pet SuppliesSame visa type · Companydismissed O-1A Case: SoccerSame outcome · Feb 2025 · Organizationdismissed EB-1C Case: ConsultingSame field · Company

Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions →
Researching for a petition?

Researching AAO decisions? Browse by visa type and criteria.

Browse Decisions