dismissed
E-2
dismissed E-2 Case: Small Business
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because the AAO lacks jurisdiction over the denial of an E-2 treaty investor application. The decision clarifies that E-2 status is conferred via an application, not a petition, and federal regulations explicitly state there is no appeal from a denied application for a change of status or extension of stay in this category.
Criteria Discussed
Appellate Jurisdiction Application Vs. Petition Appeal Rights For Change Of Status Appeal Rights For Extension Of Stay 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(C)(5) 8 C.F.R. § 248.3(G)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 23981356 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: DEC. 01, 2022 Form 1-129, Application for Change of Status (E-2 Treaty Investor) The Applicant seeks to employ the noncitizen in the United States as its small business owner under the E-2 nonirnmigrant classification for treaty investors. See section 101(a)(15)(E)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U .S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(E)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e). In accordance with the regulations, the application for a change of status was filed on Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 214.l(c)(l), 214.2(e)(20) and (21). The Director of the California Service Center denied the application. The Applicant appealed the decision to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). We will reject the appeal based on our lack of jurisdiction. Although an application for E-2 Treaty Investor status is made on Form 1-129 and E Supplement, there is no petition requirement and no petition determination that may be appealed. When it published the Final Rule governing the nonimmigrant classification, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (now U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) noted: [U]nder section 103 of the Act, the service has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for admission to this country, as well as applications for change of nonirnmigrant status to, or extensions of stay in, E nonirnmigrant classification. In this regard, it should be noted that, unlike other employment-driven classifications, E nonimmigrant visa classification is not conferred by means of a petition, but instead by an application. 62 Fed. Reg. 48138 (Sept. 12, 1997) (emphasis added). While the AAO has appellate jurisdiction over most employment-based nonimmigrant visa petitions filed on Form 1-129, the application for E nonimmigrant classification is an exception. Our appellate jurisdiction over the E nonirnmigrant classification is limited to applications filed under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(23), which provides for special procedures for classifying foreign investors in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) as E-2 nonirnmigrant treaty investors. The regulation specifically authorizes these employers to appeal denied E-2 CNMI applications to the AAO. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(23)(ix). With respect to all other decisions in Form 1-129 or 1-539 extension proceedings, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 214.l(c)(5) states: "There is no appeal from the denial of an application for extension of stay filed on Form 1-129 or 1-539." See also 8 C.F.R. § 248.3(g) (providing no appeal for denied change of status applications). Accordingly, the appeal will be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.