Dismissed
E-2
E-2 Dismissed — Unknown (2022): the AAO lacks jurisdiction
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because the AAO lacks jurisdiction. According to regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(c)(5), there is no appeal from the denial of an application for extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor, with the exception of certain cases related to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) which was not applicable here.
Criteria Discussed
Appellate Jurisdiction 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(C)(5) 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(E)(23)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →