Dismissed
E-2
E-2 Dismissed — Unknown (2013): the appeal was rejected as improperly filed
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected as improperly filed. Federal regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(c)(5), explicitly state that there is no appeal from the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. Therefore, the AAO lacks jurisdiction to review the case.
Criteria Discussed
Jurisdiction To Appeal 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(C)(5) Application For Extension Of Stay
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →