EB-1B Dismissed — Agricultural Engineering (2021): although the Beneficiary met three of the initial

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because although the Beneficiary met three of the initial evidentiary criteria, the AAO conducted a final merits determination and found the totality of the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that he is internationally recognized as outstanding in his field. The decision affirmed that meeting the minimum number of criteria does not automatically grant eligibility, and the evidence provided did not rise to the level of international recognition.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF