dismissed EB-1B Case: Professor Or Researcher

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
FILE: - Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 
WAC 03 106 51018 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Outstanding Professor or Researcher pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(B) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
L* 
hobert P. Wiemann. Director 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, California 
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be 
summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 
203(b)(l)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(B), as an outstanding 
professor or researcher. The director determined the petitioner had not established that the beneficiary 
qualifies for classification as an outstanding professor or researcher. 
On appeal, the petitioner indicated that a brief andfor evidence would be submitted to the AAO within sixty 
days. The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent 
regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(i)(3)(i). The appeal was filed on December 19, 2003. As of this date, 
more than one year later, the AAO has received nothing further. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.