sustained
EB-1B
sustained EB-1B Case: Crop Physiology
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner established that the beneficiary met at least two of the required evidentiary criteria (judging the work of others and authorship of scholarly articles). In the final merits determination, the AAO found that the totality of the evidence, including strong reference letters detailing the international impact and practical application of her research, established that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as an outstanding researcher.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Scientific Or Scholarly Research Contributions
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.