Dismissed
L-1B
L-1B Dismissed — Manufacturing (2006): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required by regulations. Counsel stated a brief or evidence would be submitted but failed to do so, even after a follow-up request from the AAO.
Criteria Discussed
Specialized Knowledge Failure To Identify Specific Error Of Law Or Fact On Appeal Failure To Submit Requested Evidence
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →