L-1B Dismissed — Nutritional Products (2011): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial. The petitioner indicated they would submit a brief and/or evidence but never did, so the AAO upheld the director's decision that the petitioner failed to establish that the position required an employee with specialized knowledge.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF