L-1B Dismissed — Restaurant (2005): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's denial, as required by regulations. Counsel promised to submit a brief with additional evidence to support the appeal but did not provide one, even after being prompted by the AAO.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF