dismissed
L-1B
dismissed L-1B Case: Tax Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision as required by regulation. The petitioner only submitted duplicate copies of documents already in the record and did not submit a brief or additional evidence as stated on the appeal form.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF T-T-, INC. APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: OCT. 16.2017 PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a '·tax technology software company,'" seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a ''client service senior staff' under the L-1 B nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 10l(a)(15)(L). 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(l5)(L). The L-18 classification allows a corporation or other legal entity (including its affiliate or subsidiary) to transfer a qualifying foreign employee with '·specialized knowledge'" to work temporarily in the United States. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identities an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. Instead. in support of the appeal the Petitioner submitted duplicate copies of documents already of record. including the Director's decision; the underlying Form I-129. Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker: and the Petitioner's response to the Director's request for evidence. On the Form I-2908, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of the May 2. 2017. tiling date. However. we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific. erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director· s decision. the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1 03.3(a)( 1 )(v). Cite as Matter ofT-T-. Inc .. ID# 684635 (AAO Cot. 16. 2017)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.