remanded L-1B Case: Tire Mold Manufacturing
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director did not sufficiently consider new evidence submitted on appeal or the petitioner's claim that the beneficiary developed new standardized procedures. The AAO determined that the petitioner needed to provide more specific, corroborated details to distinguish the beneficiary's knowledge as special or advanced compared to others in the industry. The case was sent back for further consideration and a new decision based on a more complete record.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your L-1B petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.