sustained L-1B Case: Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because upon de novo review, the AAO found that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to establish the beneficiary possesses advanced knowledge of the petitioner's product development processes. The AAO further determined that this advanced knowledge is required for the U.S.-based position, which involves leading a team to simplify and standardize product design for global implementation.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.