sustained L-1B Case: Engineering And Construction
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the Director erred in concluding the beneficiary lacked the required one year of employment in a specialized knowledge capacity. The Petitioner successfully argued that a recently issued certificate was merely a verification of long-held, company-specific knowledge, not the initial acquisition of it. The AAO was persuaded that the certificate date did not preclude the beneficiary from meeting the one-year employment requirement abroad.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.