sustained L-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible evidence, including new evidence on appeal, substantiating the beneficiary's specialized knowledge of the company's proprietary software products. The AAO found that the beneficiary's significant contributions to the design and development of these products gave him a depth of knowledge that was uncommon, not easily transferable, and integral to both his past and proposed employment.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.