Sustained
L-1B
L-1B Sustained โ Software Development (2020): the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the beneficiary possesses advanced, specialized knowledge of the company's proprietary object detection algorithm (ODA). The AAO found that this knowledge was used in his position abroad and is required for his proposed role in the U.S. Additionally, it was established that the beneficiary's placement at a client's worksite was for the specific purpose of implementing this proprietary technology, not as a prohibited labor-for-hire arrangement.
Criteria Discussed
Specialized Knowledge (Position Abroad) Specialized Knowledge (Position In U.S.) Beneficiary'S Qualifications Labor For Hire / Third-Party Worksite
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ