L-1B Dismissed — Aeronautical Engineering (2020): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, submitting only generic statements without a brief or additional evidence. Separately, the AAO agreed with the director's finding that the petitioner did not establish the beneficiary possessed specialized knowledge, as his knowledge was not shown to be distinct from other colleagues and he had only recently been certified as 'competent'.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF