L-1B Sustained — Mobile Security Technology (2018): the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible evidence of the beneficiary's 13 years of progressive experience within the company. The AAO concluded that this evidence established that the beneficiary possesses an advanced level of knowledge of the company's processes and procedures, and that both his prior position abroad and his current U.S. position require this specialized knowledge.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF