sustained
L-1B
sustained L-1B Case: Mobile Security Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible evidence of the beneficiary's 13 years of progressive experience within the company. The AAO concluded that this evidence established that the beneficiary possesses an advanced level of knowledge of the company's processes and procedures, and that both his prior position abroad and his current U.S. position require this specialized knowledge.
Criteria Discussed
Specialized Knowledge Qualifying Employment Abroad Qualifying Employment In The U.S.
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.