sustained L-1B Case: Mobile Security Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible evidence of the beneficiary's 14 years of progressive experience, establishing that he gained an advanced level of knowledge of the company's proprietary processes and procedures. The AAO found that the petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the beneficiary possessed the required specialized knowledge for both his past employment abroad and his proposed employment in the United States.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.