L-1B Sustained — Mobile Security Technology (2019): the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided detailed, consistent, and credible evidence of the beneficiary's 14 years of progressive experience, establishing that he gained an advanced level of knowledge of the company's proprietary processes and procedures. The AAO found that the petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the beneficiary possessed the required specialized knowledge for both his past employment abroad and his proposed employment in the United States.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF